The baroque time period is why I started to enjoy art much more with the separation from church and art beginning to really influence what artists can depict and the availability of their pieces. With that separation comes a decreasing recognition for artists in the wider world unlike the renaissance era which drew attention to the most popular figures such as Michelangelo, Leonardo, and Raphael's. It is that separation from these mainstay artists that I find so appealing. Art becomes so much more commonplace for the average person that it drives for so much more exploration in what art can be. It honestly is hard for me to even pick a favorite style of painting as realism in work holds a strong place in my heart and it becomes widely used in pieces during this era, especially in still life's. Where we see an exploration of detail unlike in any work before in the connection to still life's as we see just how beautiful the real world is. While in the field of genre paintings we can see depictions of everyday life which are so important to history and understanding how the world used to look, even with the stylization. The people within paintings also become so much more interesting and numerous in lifestyle as it is no longer only the superbly wealthy that support artists but the emerging middle class of the time. That is especially clear with the northern Europe's portrait paintings of the peasant folk at the time. This expansion on where, on what, and who art can be made for opens up a creativity that had been shackled by the wealth and power held by the church. It was with the increased wealth spread amongst the lower classes and the power which the royal families had wrestled away from solely religious control that granted these explorations in the arts.
This is to say that if I had to pick a single style of art it would be difficult be it the historical importance of Genre work, or an exploration of who art is made for with the peasant portraits. Yet as this class is asking which pieces I enjoy the most I made the decision to focus on still life paintings. It is within still life’s that realism begins its path to perfection as artists truly begin the growth of there skills in all manners such as the use of colors in the exacting detail, the way light falls upon an object and shades the environment around it, the way in which pure solid line work is greatest if they are unnoticed, the sheer realism of the pieces showing the true skill an artist holds.
The paintings that i wish to elaborate on are
The items within the piece are what brings my attention to it specifically as it pulls away from the common use of food or dinner that a lot of other pieces share. As one looks longer on it there seems to be a story behind the piece of a man who has gathered all that is valuable within his life. As if he is placing out all of what makes that man himself and it is the way in which that person has connected themselves to their possessions while not showing the man that holds me with the piece. Every item within connecting together a life be it his wealth as shown by the vases and cloth, or his hold to keeping himself beautiful with the makeup on the left, their skill with the violin that rests behind the pumpkin, and the books scattered throughout the piece showing a learnedness. While the piece is not truly telling how it all comes together as a book that only reads chapter titles randomly ordered. The story is still there; it simply rests outside of the viewer's purview of information.
My takeaway from the piece is that there is a life not only to the way in which the piece arranged with the placement of the objects but life to the story within the piece. So while this piece holds no inner movement the story one can build from the piece gives it a life of its own that is much harder to find in the still pieces of the time.
The piece above is another still life I enjoy for the use of colors and the way the painter made use of shading to apply a level of life to the flowers. To make use of so many different colors and yet keep the individuality of the flowers themselves is a challenging task. Yet the artist does so without mudding anny of the flowers even when overlap is present even among the petals of an individual flower. Hecke’s ability to keep this separation comes from his line work upon the flowers themselves as they hold a thickness upon the outer petals. It is a detail that is much more apparent among the petals among the center of the piece as the distinction of the petals become much more distinct. When you approach the flowers along the outside of the piece though such as the large purple flower in the center top his work in detailing becomes much more apparent as he captures the lighting effects upon the striations within the flower beautifully. It is within the effort to capture the smallest of details t5hat i enjoy the works of realism the most as an artist can strive for hours on those parts of a painting that don't hold the attention of the viewer as their centerpieces do. Yet it feels as if the flowers that lay in the dark and sit in the background supporting the mix of color in the front of the peace the greatest amount of detail.
As flowers are a softer shape compared to fruits it forces the painter to rely less on the shape work you can do with fruits and instead has them more committed to the color within the work to show an accurate representation of the flowers themselves. Another part of the piece that would have increased the difficulty of it would have been the flowers wilting time thus forcing the artist to work at an increased pace initially in order to make sure they had the correct color pallet and not have the vibrant color of the flowers dull over the time it took to paint the piece.
This painting grabs my attention for its use of light and the reflections within both the water and the glass as the artist captures the flow of light within the pieces. The way in which he captures the light flowing through the goblet onto the pan behind it and upon the shattered glass or how the light on the goblet holders reflects off of the individual wicks of glass. It is the artist's use of the light that draws most of my attention to the piece. Lighting a scene properly holds so much power that within photography there are hundreds of ways to change how a light source is implemented and the same being true for art. In painting though if one wishes to truly capture how light affects the space the artist must make room for the light itself. I believe in making a duller less full environment when compared to even just the other two still life's Mr. Heda allows for a focus on the light. The piece is not meant to be an examination of t4he objects but on the effects of the light and how it affects objects and gives another level of detail rarely seen.
Though his use of light is amazing to look through and examine he does fall short on other parts within the piece including the lemon, the table cloths, and the napkin. With the lemon and napkin both pieces feel as if they were added once the rest of the painting was complete behind them or added to cover something up. The lemon's shadow is affecting the platter it is placed upon yet it is receiving light from a different source entirely when compared to the rest of the piece. The napkin shares in the lemon with both odd placement and lighting along with having little effect on the tablecloth other than a light shadowing. The table cloth does lose a lot of detail the closer you get to the left side of the piece as well as it becomes softer and less wrinkled when compared to the right side of it.
“Vanitas.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, inc., www.britannica.com/art/vanitas-art. Accessed 21 Jan. 2025.
“Franciscus Gijsbrechts.” Artvee, artvee.com/artist/franciscus-gijsbrechts/. Accessed 21 Jan. 2025.
Wikimedia Commons, commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_van_den_Hecke_-_Flower_Basket.jpg. Accessed 21 Jan. 2025.
Liedtke, Walter. “Still-Life Painting in Northern Europe, 1600–1800: Essay: The Metropolitan Museum of Art: Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History.” The Met’s Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, 1 Jan. 2016, www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/nstl/hd_nstl.htm.